OJ Didn’t do it!
OK, enough time has passed for me to go public and be heard. I am a detective or at least I was until I retired last month. I was a detective in the private sector. I watched the trial daily. Unlike the press and many individuals who saw only what they wanted to see and heard only what the press fed them. I know he didn’t do it and the proof is right out there for all to see. He didn’t do it and I think I know who did.
Here are the pertinent facts to my speculative investigation:
To begin with, OJ’s son by a previous marriage, never got along with Nichole. The police have a long history of calls for knockdown drag out fights between these two. He hated her and she hated him. The night of the murders while OJ went on his little airplane ride, his son left for the Bahamas where he stayed until the trial was over.
Do you remember Johnny Cochren giving Judge Ito an envelope with a video tape that was to be opened, “Only if OJ was found guilty!” This tape more than likely was a confession by his son who was safely out of the country. OJ would have been granted a mistrial and could only be found guilty of loving and protecting his son.
Further evidence:
The glove (same as dad’s but smaller.)
The Bruno Mallies (Same size feet as Dad’s)
And how about the DNA? 98 % but not a perfect match? Close like a blood child perhaps.
Blood evidence on the socks in Dad’s bedroom. (Hey Dad, I screwed up, you got to help me. Oh Shit, take off your clothes.)
It’s all there. The facts don’t lie.
So OJ is innocent of the murders, but not innocent of all crime. But it makes me wonder how his son sleeps at night.
Disclaimer:
This article is all supposition, speculation and opinion on my part. No inferences should be drawn or were intended to made as to anyones complicity in any crime.
I like how they couldnt find anyone else who had any real motive or situation to commit the murder and havent brought anyone else to trial yet
I agree completely. They however believe that they caught the culprit and that the jury turned him lose. That’s why they they kick him down and try their best to keep him down. I wonder how his oldest son sleeps.
I have said this for years, NO ONE would Push a child away from a car the way O’J's friend did, when the distraught child is approaching a car with the depressed dad inside, you would lovingly try to console the child!!!
Yes why did he shove his son away from the Bronco in anger (the friend)
Perhaps they pushed the child away because he knew his father was going to take the rap and wanted to stop him. I don’t know. Frankly I don’t remember a child being pushed away from the vehicle.
i agree.. everyone thinks i am crazy when i say i think the son did it.. nice to see i am not the only one!
You have acquired a fair amount of evidence on this case, your logic will show people the real culprit of the murders, and that it wasn’t OJ himself but in fact his son.
Well it is all speculative of course. But I believe it to be true. The evidence supports the supposition. But unless or until the video tape that OJ gave to Judge Ito is viewed, we will probably never know.
98% means it was his blood, it’s just a higher margin of computer error allowed for being a newer technology back then. The son would have only been a 50% DNA match. And you call yourself a detective, really.
The blood was insignificant and inconsequential to the case. And I believe a red herring.
I agree, I think O.J is guilty of being a loving father, and his reaction was that of a parent who had to come to terms with what his son had done and try to grapple with the question of “do I do the right thing and turn in my son with the possibility of a death sentence, or do I try and protect my child.” If you were in that situation what would you do? And then after he was found not guilty the world had convicted him and made his life horrible. Is it any wonder his downward spiral?