OJ Didn’t do it!
OK, enough time has passed for me to go public and be heard. I am a detective or at least I was until I retired last month. I was a detective in the private sector. I watched the trial daily. Unlike the press and many individuals who saw only what they wanted to see and heard only what the press fed them. I know he didn’t do it and the proof is right out there for all to see. He didn’t do it and I think I know who did.
Here are the pertinent facts to my investigation:
To begin with, OJ’s son never got along with Nichole. The police have a long history of calls for knockdown drag out fights between these two. He hated her. The night of the murders while OJ went on his little airplane ride, his son left for the Bahamas where he stayed until the trial was over.
Do you remember Johnny Cochren giving Judge Ito an envelope with a video tape that was to be opened, “Only if OJ was found guilty!” This tape more than likely was a confession by his son who was safely out of the country. OJ would have been granted a mistrial and could only be found guilty of loving and protecting his son.
Further evidence:
The glove (same as dad’s but smaller.)
The Bruno Mallies (Same size feet as Dad’s)
And how about the DNA? 98 % but not a perfect match? Close like a blood child perhaps.
Blood evidence on the socks in Dad’s bedroom. (Hey Dad, I screwed up, you got to help me. Oh Shit, take off your clothes. )
It’s all there. The facts don’t lie.
So OJ is innocent of the murders, but not innocent of all crime. But it makes me wonder how his son sleeps at night.
If I may play Ddevil’s Advocate here. Sir, you do not offer any sort of evidence, what so ever. “…[t]his tape was a confession by his son who was safely out of the country,” is not evidence.
You offer a theory. A decent one, but a theory with no proof to back your claims. If you are (or were) a dectective as you claim, you should know better. You’re pretty much doing exactly what you admonished the media for.
If in fact, Cochren gave Alito a taped confession of O.J’s son, he would have to turn that over to the police wouldn’t he? To hide it and not introduce as proof of O.J’s innocence, wouldn’t that be considered evidence tampering or obstruction of justice? Would Cochren have risked his career and freedom in that way?
I always appreciate the devil’s advocate. The evidence is the glove, the shoes, the dna evidence that was never matched or attempt to be matched to that of the son. I suspect if it had, the outcome would be different.
Regarding the tape. It was offered AND agreed to by the court, that it would only be opened IF he was found guilty. He wasn’t. I would love to see what was on it. Tell me something else that could be on the tape that would have changed the tide if he had been found guilty. It was tendered so that a time stamp of before the trial would be apparent. Meaning that it was not created after the fact. What happened to the tape is a mystery. Myself, I think the judge opened it and watched it. That would explain his disinterest in the trial but admitting that he watched it would have been a bigger mess and he would have to recuse himself at the very least. And the admissibility of the tape would then also be in question as it had been opened. We will never know though as I am sure that it has been destroyed. It was never entered as evidence.
And yes, it is a theory. But one backed with credible evidence. My question then is this, if he was found innocent, then why is the investigation over?
The tape contained something that would have prevented the sentence of death…. Your “theory” is completely wrong. ,
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/02/oj-simpson-book-jason-simpson-william-dear_n_1397583.html
It would seem perhaps you were on to something. I find this fascinating!!!
LOL, never mind. I realize you are one in the same. Should’ve checked it out first. I’ll be fascinated if you are right.
No, I am not him. In fact, this is the first I have seen this. Thanks. BUT! I rest my case. But I truly am not him. Look at the dates.